The Tesla Powerwall is one of the most popular home battery energy storage systems, which earlier this year reached 500,000 global installations.
According to the most recent reports, Tesla quietly started installations of the new, third generation of the Powerwall (PW3 in short).
Last Friday, teslamotorsclub.com forum member andy92782 posted photos of its new Powerwall installation, which is one of the first PW3. The topic quickly caught the attention of Tesla enthusiasts and after being highlighted by Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt / X), even prompted Tesla CEO Elon Musk to post brief info.
Tesla's boss indirectly confirmed the existence of the Powerwall 3, by describing a few advantages of the new unit - like an optimised design for ease of installation and high power output.
As we can see in the photos, the new Tesla Powerwall is not as appealing as the currently used Powerwall 2, which has been present on the market for seven years or so. The info also points out that it's smaller at approximately 43-inch x 24-inch x 7-inch - two inches shorter, six inches narrower, and about one inch thicker.
There are many questions related to the new Tesla Powerwall 3 specs. The photo of the PW3 reveals that it's a 13.5-kilowatt-hour unit, which means that the nominal capacity might be the same (very similar) as in the case of the PW2.
There is an inverter inside and the power output is from 5.8 kVA to 11.5 kVA (basically close to 5.8 kW-11.5 kW of real power), depending on the current 24-48 amps at 240 volts. That's an increase compared to 5 kilowatts of continuous power output previously (7 kW peak for 10 seconds).
Weight is almost 130 kg (287 pounds), according to the photo, which is some 14 percent more than 114 kg (251 lbs) in the Powerwall 2.
All those things enable us to think that the new Powerwall 3 is equipped with LFP battery cells, although it's not officially confirmed.
We guess that this is an LFP system because the new unit is heavier while offering a similar energy capacity. That's because the LFP battery cells are less energy-dense than the previously used high-nickel chemistry. The increased weight is probably partially compensated by an ability to charge the LFP cells to a higher state-of-charge and to maintain such a high state-of-charge without as big an impact on longevity, as in the case of NCM/NCA cells (similarly as in the case of the Tesla Model 3 LFP and NCA versions).
Another thing is that the PW3 is smaller - that's probably because of the use of a prismatic cell format (typical for LFP), rather than cylindrical battery cells (used previously). In general, the prismatic battery cells/modules are considered more efficient in terms of space utilisation.
One of the TMC forum members (GigaGrunt) noted that the PW3 probably does not have liquid cooling like the PW2. The LFP batteries are safer and might cope better in higher temperatures, although they have issues at lower temperatures (especially fast charging at below-freezing temperatures). Powerwalls are not fast-charged like electric cars, so this is not a big issue. Air cooling, if confirmed, would also translate into weight and cost savings.
The LFP battery chemistry, despite its lower energy density, as compared to high-nickel cathode chemistries of lithium-ion batteries, have one big advantage - lower price per capacity unit. This is one of the key factors for Tesla, especially today when we see price wars in the EV business.
One last unknown is the battery supplier. It might be CATL, which has been providing LFP batteries for Tesla for several years, but this also is not confirmed.